What is the Difference between a Psychologist, a Psychotherapist, a Psychiatrist, a Social Worker, a LPC, a LMFT, a LSCW, a PsyD, a PHD………

share save 171 16 What is the Difference between a Psychologist, a Psychotherapist, a Psychiatrist, a Social Worker, a LPC, a LMFT, a LSCW, a PsyD, a PHD………

Quick summary: My intention is to give you a horribly over-simplified definition of all those terms that you may find when you are100 0530 300x225 What is the Difference between a Psychologist, a Psychotherapist, a Psychiatrist, a Social Worker, a LPC, a LMFT, a LSCW, a PsyD, a PHD……… looking for a mental health worker. I will give you an easy to understand definition of what the difference is between a Psychologist, Psychotherapist, Psychiatrist, Social Worker etc… I must add this disclosure up front – there is no strict definition nor is there any way to accurately state the specific functions of any of these mental health care workers. The specific abilities or specialties of any mental health worker vary greatly depending on their: personality, school they went to, age, education outside of college etc…

 

Mental health care workers are required to attain continuing education credits every year in order to keep their licensure… this means that all people in the field are required to continue their mental health education long after they graduate from university.

 

Mental health care workers all have there own individual interests which encourage them to study material outside of their specialty area.

 

  • A psychiatrist could have twenty years of experience and education in teaching mindfulness – there title still remains simply psychiatrist.

 

  • A social worker could have thirty years supporting her patients with chronic mental health conditions in staying properly medicated… she may know more about pharmacology (the effects of the medications) than 90% of psychiatrists, but she will still be labeled a social worker.

 

The point is that Mental Health terms in no way tell the full story about a professional.

  • It is not my intention to imply that one group has one skill and does not have another skill…

 

Again I am giving you generalizations here…

 

  • A Psychiatrist is the only one on the list that is a medical doctor = MD – they are the only ones on the list who prescribe medication.  
    • (All went to med school and most did not go to a counseling program – this has changed – an older psychiatrist might have been required to do both).
    • If a psychiatrist is also a psychotherapist, then the doctor generally had to attain their counseling ability separate from their doctoral degree (they may have a MD and an MA in Counseling for example… this is not horribly common as a psychiatrist will make more money prescribing medication).
    • In is very common for a psychiatrist to work in collaboration with a psychotherapist – research has shown that for some conditions it is most advantageous to have both interventions concurrently.

 

  • Psychologists are required to write a thesis for their doctoral degree and generally have significantly more experience with research and University level teaching (conducting research, statistics, assessment etc).
    • A Clinical Psychologist can conduct more assessments and research than others in the field (if you want to have an IQ test or a psychological evaluation done it is best to look for a psychologist).
    • Psychologists have a doctoral degree = PhD or Psyd.
    • The field of psychology is gigantic – not all psychologists are in anyway concerned with psychotherapy.

 

  • Social workers abilities are extremely broad – some SW schools focus more on case management and larger community based assistance and some schools focus primarily of psychotherapy.
    • Social workers typically have an advanced education in what I will call social ecology – they understand how society, culture, family, environment, and individuals interact and affect each other.
    • Social workers tend to have the most knowledge related to community resources.

 

  • Master’s level therapists abilities are also broad – they all receive training in conducting psychotherapy, but some schools are catered towards very specific vocations (ex. forensic therapy, school counseling, couples counseling etc).
    • Masters level therapist all receive an education in conducting individual psychotherapy (this is not always a requirement for the other fields though many in the other fields have an education in psychotherapy – I know this is horribly confusing).

 

  • Marriage and Family therapy This is a specialty in which a counselor will have an advanced ability to conduct therapy with more than one client in the room – the theories and interventions are slightly different. Most graduate programs still do not require their students to learn about couples and family therapy.

 

  • Psychotherapist – anyone who conducts psychotherapy. Not all states regulate the practice of psychotherapy… in such an instance anyone can call themselves a psychotherapist.

 

  • Coach A coach does not yet have a standardized definition – generally coaches are more willing to give advice. There are currently some new schools which are graduating professional coaches… historically coaches did not necessarily have any one specific type of standardized education (anyone can be a coach).

 

  • Therapists…counselor… psychotherapist these terms are interchangeable – they are all the same.

 

  • LMFT – Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist
  • LPC – Licensed professional counselor
  • LSW – Licensed social worker
  • LCSW – Licensed clinical social worker 

 

  • The licensed therapist/counselor must have a masters degree or higher (PhD or PSYD), and must have completed the requirements of the relevant state’s department or regulatory services.

 

  • PhD – Completed a Doctorate program
  • PsyD – Completed a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology
  • MA or MS – Completed a Masters Degree program
  • MD – Completed a doctoral degree in medicine

 

  •   (the letters do not indicate what field the degree is in)

 

  • Licensure – Most states have a Government run regulatory body which grants licensure to mental health professionals. The intention is good, but the follow through is not always great.
    • The ideal would be for licensure to be achieved as a result of displaying competence – we have not yet arrived at this ideal.
    • There are many professionals who are granted a license simply by completing their degree… others have post degree requirements.
      • For example, in my state a social worker receives a license (LSW) for completing their master’s degree… they may use their license for billing purposes related to psychotherapy. Not all social worker attend school to learn psychotherapy – Social workers are responsible for a significant amount of social assistance tasks.
      •  A Clinical therapist does not receive a license when they complete their Masters degree… they cannot bill insurance or Medicaid for psychotherapy services. All clinical therapists attend school to learn psychotherapy.
  • The post degree requirements generally are related to conducting mental health services, but they are not always related to conducting services in a professional’s specialty (ex. it is very common for people to meet their licensure hours related to psychotherapy while working in behavior modification programs). 
  • Some universities offer a very good education in conducting mental health services, but they lack accreditation – for graduates from unaccredited school it can be very difficult if not impossible to attain a license though they possess the ability to conduct mental health services.
    • (Most online schools have managed to gain accreditation… many small universities have not = this is largely do to financial constraints.)
  • What does a license tell you about a mental health professional? There is no one good answer – you would have to ask.
    • (People have radically different viewpoints on this – there are many that would be furiously against this opinion – they would suggest that licensure adequately measures competence – there is no research to support this.)

 

What about all the other letters like CAC (certified addictions counselor)?

  • There are certain programs that a clinician can pay for to receive extra letters at the end of their title – these letters are meant to indicate a specialty.
  • Unfortunately, these letters are not very helpful as most specialties still do not have their own special letters… and there are also many people who have a specialty but they did not pay the extra money for the letters (there are professors who ‘wrote the books’ on specialties, but do not have specialty letters).
    • Like licensure, it is a good and necessary idea that has not received adequate follow through from the regulatory agencies.

 

So who is right for you? – read my post on finding a therapist for more helpful information…

Please don’t be discouraged – the letters and labels might not be as helpful as you would like them to be, but almost all mental health professionals are perfectly willing and able to tell you everything that you need to know about how they can best help you.

4 Comments

Filed under Mental Health Services, Therapy Explained, Simplified, and Un-Jargoned

Dialectics – open your mind and balance will occur naturally

share save 171 16 Dialectics – open your mind and balance will occur naturally

 Quick summary: There are many different definitions of what “dialectic” means and most are relatively related while others are a bit different (the Hindu and the Buddhist dialectics are more similar than the Socratic dialectic). I intend to talk about Dialects as a subject which helps us to experience the idea that all things are both “good” and “bad” at the same time. The purpose of such a discussion is to propose that people whom you disagree with are not wrong per say… they simply hold a different opinion or perspective. I am not trying to create indifference regarding the actions that you or anybody else would take… by accepting dialectics we can free ourselves from the judgments of our minds; which I believe leads us naturally towards engaging in actions that promote systemic harmony.

 

Note – It is virtually impossible to write about dialectics without constantly contradicting one’s self. For every point I make the opposite point is infinitely true – if I wrote this way I would never finish this blog.

 

Dialectic – everything is good and bad, right and wrong (the chicken and the egg)

Dichotomy – everything is good or bad, right or wrong (the chicken or the egg)

 

One purpose of dialectic thinking is to enable yourself to be open-minded about all that occurs in your perception.

  • By accepting that you will not be able to successfully categorize your environment with dichotomous labels, such as good or bad, you free yourself to engage the world with a child-like curiosity while being less guarded or defensive. In short – you are more open and accessible to this experience we call life.

 

“I don’t know” – this statement is often thought of as an example of wisdom and there are many expressions based on its’ underlying themes. Why? When someone says, “I don’t know,” he or she is essentially suggesting,

  • “I don’t claim to know any objective truths or any truths that would increase my likelihood of finding life predictable- and I can accept that.”

 

Opening your minds to other people’s subjective perception opens you up to more people – I am a proponent of relationships and I have seen many relationships falter because people chose their dichotomous belief over the relationship. (This also has to do with the ego, which I will cover in a future blog).

            – lets say you have a friend that is your skiing buddy… one night you get into an argument about health care… you can’t reach a point of agreement and you both go your separate ways. Here is the dichotomy – “I like going skiing with my friend, but he has health care views I disagree with” (what does health care have to do with skiing?). Here is the dialectic – “I like my going skiing with my friend, and he has health care views I disagree with.”

            - Dialectics can allow you do observe without the need for judgments (which can call for decisive actions) – in this way you get to keep more of the friends that you “disagree” with.

 

Existentialism (pertaining to meaning such as the meaning of life)Our mind needs to categories and judge our existence to reduce something called existential anxiety (anxiety that we hold when we find something to be meaningless – example – “why did the person die in the natural disaster”).

            – We create dichotomies to make life appear to be more predictable – if life was more predictable it would be easier for us to find meaning or to make sense of life. Our minds believe that if we could find meaning then we could significantly reduce our constant underlying fear of death (I will blog about this in the future). Incidentally for some reason my acceptance of the dialectic –“I am infinitely everything and infinitely nothing,” dramatically reduced my own fear of death.

 

Exercise 1) – Get together with a group of people and try to arrive at a universal truth (something that is always true in every context). Be sensitive in your critiques, but at the same time hold an understanding that the point of the exercise is to prove that from a philosophical perspective there are no universal truths. Note – this is not a jab at religions – I too choose to have faith in some of my beliefs (the difference is that I don’t really care if they are ‘true’ and I know that I could never prove them to be ‘true’).

Exercise 2) – think about a subject that you subjectively label as “bad”… now attempt to alter your perception so that you see that subject as good (pick a fairly benign topic when you start).

            -ex) * The forest fire that burned down my fiends house was bad… it destroyed irreplaceable possession like their photo albums.

                   * The forest fire was good in that the forest needs fires in order to be healthy; my friends chose to live there because of the forest. Without fire the forest seeds are not released.

 

I have two biases (related to the subject) that I should offer – These biases explain why I do not hold a fear that dialects will lead to an indifference that will cause people to engage in meaningless destruction. –or why I believe dialectics do not lead to sociopathic behavior.

 

  • I believe that all people are inherently ‘good’ – by ‘good’ I mean that the intention of all individuals (parts) holds the intention of maintaining balance or harmony for the system (whole) – and visa versa (this is the biological dialectic – the parts are the whole and the whole is the parts – the part are greater than the whole and the whole is greater than the sum of its parts). As a therapist I have never met a “bad person” and by opening my mind I can say that I don’t need to ‘fake’ acceptance as my reality has thus far shown that there is something to empathize with in every human I’ve ever met (and organism for that matter). “The worst things done in the world were done with good intention.”

 

  • I believe in intuition – sure I have read about meta-cognition (pre-thought – cognitions outside of our awareness) and I love the literature on the subject… and I am talking about something a bit different – something metaphysical which universally communicates an understating of ecological like principles (the interconnectedness of all things).

 

Judgments which serve to objectively categorize – Our minds tend to make decisions based on information that is not based on the present moment (ex. if I destroy this person I will be safer in the future). By holding firmly to a set belief that something is absolutely always good or absolutely always bad, we remove our ability to let our intuition guide our actions within the relative context of the given moment.

Do the Ends justify the Means? – If your intuition or your inner empathy compass (or whichever term you prefer) tells you in the moment what action ‘feels’ right, would it be the right decisions to ignore this feeling in order to follow the procedure manufactured by your mind and its’ desire to create objectivity? Again – “some of the worst actions imaginable were done with good intention.”

  • the concept of “the ends justify the means” is based on the idea that – there is a cause and effect relationship between the ends and the means – in other word the means (actions) will irrefutably lead to the desired ends (result) – If this were true then life would be predicable.

“Life is good and bad… now you choose how your gonna see it” – Will

swamp farther 300x225 Dialectics – open your mind and balance will occur naturallyacorns verticle 225x300 Dialectics – open your mind and balance will occur naturally

16 Comments

Filed under Individual Growth, Mindfulness & Meditation, Philosophy & Theory, Therapy Explained, Simplified, and Un-Jargoned

What are ‘triggers’ – automatic responces

share save 171 16 What are triggers   automatic responces

What does a therapist mean when he/she talks about triggers… when they say that my son was triggered by something?

Quick answer – a trigger is anything in the environment (person, place, thing, thought etc) that causes a predictable reaction in a person. Very often people are unaware of their triggers… they might be fully aware of the reaction… but they are not always aware of why they seemingly reacted automatically and without intention. Triggers very often cause an emotional reaction that does not fit the current situation.

As in the literal case of a gun (from which the metaphor was probably taken from) if you pull a trigger… very predictably, a bullet will shoot out. 

Some of you might remember the study in which the scientist trained the dog to salivate every time that he rang a bell (the bell is then the trigger and the salivation is the automatic and unconscious response)… the very same thing can happen in humans. 

the reason that therapists talk so often about triggers in the context of relational or behavioral difficulties is to help people to understand that one, often people are reacting automatically and they truly did not ‘think before they acted’, and two, often a ‘triggered person’ will have a reaction that seems to be out of place given the current circumstance.

For example: lets say there is a guy named Bob who seems to always get ‘excessively angry’ any time that someone enters into a room without knocking first. Bob has a wife named Suzie and they are currently seeking counseling as Suzie feels that she is being unjustly treated as Bob yells at her for “small things like not knocking before she enters her own house.” When Bob was 12 he was in the bathroom using the toilet and his sister and her friend walked right in as they forgot to knock. The girls all laughed at Bob and he was incredibly embarrassed (note: it is possible that Bob remembers this story very well and it is possible that he only vaguely remembers this occurrence). Bob believes that he is justified at getting angry at his wife when in truth his emotions are mostly the result of being ‘triggered’ as he has an automatic emotional reaction to people entering rooms without notification. Therapy can help people to uncover their triggers so as to avoid acting automatically as Bob did.

Why do we have triggers then? Triggers are very important to survival. If we did not react automatically to certain stimuli we would never be able to consciously make choices in time to avoid potentially dangerous situations.

3 Comments

Filed under Relationship Tips, Therapy Explained, Simplified, and Un-Jargoned

Overcoming feelings of Shame | Shame avoided will stay quite the same…

share save 171 16 Overcoming feelings of Shame | Shame avoided will stay quite the same…

Guilt is mixture of melancholic anxiety that steps from a remorse held for an100 4706 300x225 Overcoming feelings of Shame | Shame avoided will stay quite the same… action engaged in… shame is a deeper depression accompanied by a degree of restless self-hatred which arrives when we cannot accept and forgive our self – when we essentially feel uncomfortable with who we are as opposed to feeling unrest for an action we partook in.

Guilt is for actions

Shame is for identity… shame is felt for who we are… shame tricks us into believing that its’ uncomfortable feelings are permanent, justified or deserving, and unforgivable or unresolvable…

Shame convinces us to believe that “I am flawed and unforgivable for __________, I am an unacceptable person.”

The strange thing about shame is that it enslaves us without generally making its’ presence overtly known… most people crippled by the grasp of shame will not say that they feel shame nor would they easily be able to identify the source of their shame.

People engage is all sorts of relationally sabotaging behaviors because of their shame… they feel inadequate and undeserving of love and attention and therefor unconsciously engage in behaviors which ultimately manifest their fears and destroy their attachments to others…

But their fears were never true… no one is undeserving of love… shame convinces you that you are so unacceptable that you deserve to be imprisoned in your self-enabled misery.

Shame quiets your voice…

Shame keeps your limbs from moving in ways of defending your self-worth…

Shame riddles you with distracting anxieties that steal your attention from isolating the source of your discomfort…

Finding your shame and offering it acknowledgment steals a significant degree of your shame’s power.

Ask yourself,

“Why do I not defend my boundaries?”

“Why do I not allow myself to trust my intuition?”

“What is keeping me from attempting to achieve my potential?”

“Why am I able to protect everyone’s wellbeing except for my own?”

“Why do my actions suggest that I am undeserving of a voice?”

 

Within these existential contemplations you may find the source of your shame… allow the feeling to be understood by your body and by your emotional self.

Shame prefers to direct you unconsciously… once your shame is in your consciousness it will still attempt to control you, but it will have lost some of its’ deceptive strength.

By simply accepting and acknowledging shame you will do a great deal in freeing yourself from its’ symptoms of anxiety, disempowerment, hopelessness, and depression.

Shame is strangely related to pride… shame is related to the kind of hurtful pride which gives you such inflated goals that you find your imperfections impermissible…

If you should choose to have so much pride that you cannot accept that you are not perfect… you will have a difficult time ever overcoming your shame…

Part of your recovery… part of you forgiving yourself… … … is humility

To humbly and honestly say, “I can accept my imperfections… I am acceptable, lovable, and deserving of respect… it is the overly proud voice inside of me that suggests I should be perfect, which is the source of my shame.”

If you can be accepting of you faults you take away the footing of shame… you offer shame no means to latch onto you.

By trusting that you will do everything in your power to act with compassion towards yourself and others you can justifiably and rationally move forward without shame… every action is both good and bad… perfection is relative to perception… and as perception is inconsistent, perfection is not objective.

You cannot live without fault… you can live with acceptance and compassion.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized